Pet-Safe Functional Solutions

Functional Ingredients and Fragrance Strategies for Pet Care Products

Pets are members of the family, and the care we extend to them is equal in measure to that which we afford our human kin. According to a 2022 consumer survey, there are over 900 million pet animals worldwide, with dogs and cats together accounting for roughly 80 per cent of the pet market. Nearly 70 per cent of households in the United States keep pets; in Indonesia, more than 45 per cent of households keep cats; in the Philippines, over 65 per cent keep dogs; and Russia claims the highest proportion of cat-owning households globally, at 59 per cent. Beyond dogs and cats, the populations of exotic companion animals — including ornamental fish, reptiles, rodents and birds — are also growing at a rapid pace. 

We work across five core domains — disinfection, odour control, parasite control, scent design and skin repair — offering ingredient screening and application development support tailored to the sensitive environments in which pets live.

Risk-first Statement

Plant-derived does not automatically mean pet-safe

Not all plant volatile oils and plant monomers are pet-friendly. This is because different pets, due to their physiological structure, metabolic capacity, and behavioral habits, may experience negative reactions.

For example, cats lack glucuronidase (UGT), so some phenolic and terpenoid substances cannot be metabolized by the liver, leading to their accumulation and potentially causing liver toxicity.

Birds have a unique air sac structure, and human diffusers and spray products can cause aerosols to reach deep into the birds’ lungs, causing respiratory damage.

The eugenol, a common antibacterial agent, is used as an anesthetic in aquaculture. Using it around aquariums could potentially injure the fish.

Safety framework

Learning the S1-S5 security assessment tool using a sliding format

For volatile oils or plant monomers in pet cleaning and grooming products, we have established a theoretical safety assessment system from S1 to S5 through data analysis and organization. This assessment system can help formulators or purchasing managers quickly identify ingredients suitable for pet cleaning and grooming.

! Note: The safety assessment system is for screening purposes only and does not represent corresponding experimental or testing results. The logic behind this guideline is to differentiate between the metabolic differences between pets and humans. It aims to advise on the safety of antibacterial, deodorizing, or grooming products used in different species environments. Any potential negative harm to pets should be verified through actual experimental testing.

”S1″

S1 — Pet Safe

Suitable under intended use conditions

Designed for pet-related product concepts with low expected irritation or exposure concern.

DefinitionLow concern under normal pet-use positioning.
What it usually meansPreferred starting point for direct-use and higher-contact concepts.

Implication for formulationCan anchor the mildness baseline of the product story.

”S2″

S2 — Use With Care

Manageable with clear controls

Usable when concentration, ventilation, and contact conditions are controlled in a disciplined way.

DefinitionLow but not negligible concern
Typical cautionNeeds clearer usage boundaries in enclosed or repeated-use scenarios
Implication for formulationSuitable when paired with dosage discipline and application fit

”S3″

S3 — Moderate Risk

Requires targeted review before use

May be considered only after exposure limitation and category-specific technical review.

DefinitionModerate concern that cannot be generalized as pet-safe
Typical cautionShould not be used casually in direct-use or repeated exposure concepts
Implication for formulationNeeds stronger rationale, lower burden, and narrower application scope

”S4″

S4 — High Risk

Should be avoided in most pet-facing applications

Associated with elevated sensitivity, irritation, or toxicological concern under common pet-use routes.

DefinitionHigh concern under inhalation, dermal, or incidental ingestion exposure
Typical cautionParticularly problematic in enclosed spaces or high-frequency products
Implication for formulationUsually incompatible with a pet-safe positioning narrative

”S5″

S5 — High Risk

Not appropriate for pet-use positioning

Represents strong concern in direct exposure, accidental ingestion, or confined-space scenarios.

DefinitionExtreme concern for pet-facing use
Typical cautionShould be excluded from pet-facing concept development
Implication for formulationBest treated as a clear no-go zone in the framework

Solution index

Five editorial solution modules for long-form content

Antimicrobial Disinfection

Surface hygiene support

Odor Control

Neutralization before masking

Pest Repellency

Higher caution required

Fragrance for Pet Products

Controlled scent identity

Skin Recovery Support

Mild care concepts

01

Antimicrobial Disinfection

For hygiene-focused products used on surfaces, tools, and surrounding pet environments.

Overview

Support cleaner pet-contact environments while controlling residue transfer and sensory burden.

Where it fits

Sprays, wipes, cage cleaners, floor cleaners, accessory cleaning products.

Safety note

Consider paw of pets contact, residue transfer, and incidental licking as core formula design constraints.

Development focus

Low-residue systems, mild sensory profile, and hygiene-oriented product language.

02

Odor Control

For litter areas, fabrics, carriers, floors, and enclosed pet spaces that need odor management.

Overview

Focus on reducing unpleasant odor without turning the product into a high-load fragrance system.

Where it fits

Deodorizing sprays, litter additives, fabric refreshers, and indoor hygiene products.

Safety note

Repeated inhalation in enclosed spaces should guide loading level and scent intensity decisions.

Development focus

Fast odor reduction, moderate scent profile, and a neutralization-led value proposition.

03

Pest Repellency

For repellency-oriented concepts used in seasonal, outdoor, and environmental protection scenarios.

Overview

Repellency can be attractive as a category, but it typically carries the strongest screening requirements.

Where it fits

Sprays, collars, shampoos, environmental repellents, and outdoor support products.

Safety note

Dermal exposure, inhalation, and grooming-related ingestion should all be reviewed together.

Development focus

Exposure minimization, careful active selection, and tightly bounded claims strategy.

04

Fragrance for Pet Products

For grooming, cleaning, deodorizing, and lifestyle products that need a controlled fragrance identity.

Overview

Fragrance should create product identity without overloading the pet environment.

Where it fits

Shampoos, wipes, deodorizing sprays, refreshers, and premium accessory products.

Safety note

Airborne intensity, skin proximity, and lingering residue should all inform scent architecture.

Development focus

Balanced olfactive profile, lower load, and category-fit fragrance identity.

05

Skin Recovery Support

For mild, care-oriented concepts focused on skin comfort, barrier support, and post-cleansing recovery.

Overview

Support sensitive-skin positioning through a lower-burden and milder formulation story.

Where it fits

Sprays, serums, foams, wipes, and after-grooming support products.

Safety note

Repeated contact on already sensitive skin requires stricter control over fragrance and reactivity.

Development focus

Mildness, compatibility, barrier-friendly positioning, and restrained sensory design.

Get the Quote

Contact our sales team to get the latest product specifications and product quotes.