Industry News, Coatings

Vegetable Oil-Based Urethanes for Wood Coatings

Vegetable Oil-Based Urethanes for Wood Coatings

Polyurethane polymers are widely used in coatings, foams, elastomers, adhesives, sealants, inks, film, fiber and engineering plastics among other things. Specifically in the coatings area, they are commonly used in industrial, construction, textile, leather, floor finishes and other one- or two-component coatings due to the unique properties of polyurethanes and isocyanate-based reactions. Generally speaking, polyurethanes have good toughness that is primarily due to the molecular structure of the main chain of alternating soft and hard segments. The soft segment imparts flexibility to the polymer while the hydrogen bonds in the hard segment not only provide hardness but also form a physical crosslinking point that facilitates bonding. As a result, these polyurethanes are “soft but not sticky” and “hard but not brittle”, and these performance attributes widen the potential applications for polyurethane coatings.

As specified by ASTM D16, Standard Terminology for Paint, Related Coatings, Materials, and Applications, urethane coatings are classified from Type I to Type VI. Type I urethane coatings are oil based, and these types of urethanes are also called urethane-modified alkyds, whereby the isocyanate fully or partially replaces dibasic acid in the binder. A Type I urethane is usually made of an unsaturated vegetable oil or fatty acid in organic solvent; it is used as varnish and has been prevalent in the wood floor coatings market for more than half a century.1 As shown in Figure 1, the film formation for this type of coating is achieved by lacquer-dry followed by oxidative curing in the presence of a metallic drier. There are two categories of Type I urethanes: oil-modified urethanes (OMU), in which the isocyanate fully replaces dibasic acid in alkyd, and uralkyds, in which the isocyanate only partially replaces the dibasic acid. This urethane binder combines the benefits of urethanes such as abrasion resistance, hydrolytic stability and toughness with the benefits of alkyds such as oxidative crosslinking and use of renewable materials.

FIGURE 1 » Solventborne OMU crosslinked film formation.

FIGURE 1 » Solventborne OMU crosslinked film formation. ©PCI

Conventional solventborne (SB) OMU or uralkyd varnishes have a VOC greater than 450 g/L, and with VOC regulations tightening, lower-VOC OMUs have become increasingly important. One method used to lower the VOC is to reduce the amount of solvent in order to make a high-solids-content varnish. Because the viscosity of the polymer solution is directly proportional to its molecular weight, this high-solids-content varnish must have a lower molecular weight in order to maintain a workable application viscosity. However, the lower-molecular-weight varnish shows deficiencies in film performance such as slow dry and soft film. Table 1 compares the basic film performance of 550, 450 and 350 g/L VOC varnishes.

Solventborne OMU1 Designed VOC, g/l
550 450 350
Solids, % 40 49 62
Viscosity, cps 79 108 111
Molecular weight (Mn) 7000 6000 3500
Dry hard, hr:min3 1:30 2:45 6:00
Sward hardness 48 36 14
Mar resistance4 Good Good Good
Abrasion resistance5 98 86 104
Chemical resistance6 3.6 3.2 2.8
1All contain 200 ppm Cobalt drier
2Low-aromatic mineral spirits
33 mil Bird bar on glass plate
4Fingernail test, check after 24 hrs
5Taber, CS17 wheels, 1000 cycles, 1kg load, mg loss
6 ASTM D-1308 spot test, 23 chemicals, 4 hr exposure, average rating 0-5 with 5=no effect
Table 1. Comparison of SB OMU at various VOC levels.

Another method used to make solventborne OMU with lower VOC is to use exempt solvent. In this approach, the polymer molecular weight can be kept reasonably high, which is advantageous to film performance. Common exempt solvents are listed in Table 2.

Exempt Solvent Flash Point, °F Evaporation Rate
Acetone -4 5.6
Methyl acetate 14 6.0
t-Butyl acetate 72 2.8
Parachlorobenzotrifluoride (PCBTF) 109 0.9
Volatile methylsiloxane (VMS) 131 0.2
Table 2. Exempt solvents.

The most common exempt solvents for OMUs are PCBTF and VMS due to their flash point and evaporation rate. Table 3 shows the performance of solventborne OMU varnishes at a VOC of 450 g/L, 350 g/L by the high solids approach, and 350 g/L VOC by the exempt solvent approach. It is clear that the 350 g/L VOC OMU by the exempt solvent approach has improved dry time and film hardness due to the high-molecular-weight polymer.

Solventborne OMU1 Designed VOC, g/L
450 350 350
Solids, % 49 62 46
Viscosity, cps 108 111 109
Molecular weight (Mn) 6000 3500 6000
Dry hard, hr:min2 2:45 6:00 4:30
Sward hardness 36 14 38
Mar resistance3 Good Good Good
Abrasion resistance4 86 104 87
Chemical resistance5 3.2 2.8 3.7
1All contain 200 ppm Cobalt drier
23 mil Bird bar on glass plate
3Fingernail test, check after 24 hrs
4Taber, CS17 wheels, 1000 cycles, 1kg load, mg loss
5ASTM D-1308 spot test, 23 chemicals, 4 hr exposure, average rating 0-5 with 5=no effect
Table 3. Comparison of the performance of SB OMU with exempt solvent.

Low-VOC Type I urethanes for solventborne coatings include high solids and exempt solvent approaches, but there are potential drawbacks to each approach. The high solids approach requires the molecular weight of the polymer to be lowered to maintain a good working viscosity, but this translates to a longer dry time, softer film and less coating durability. The exempt solvent approach overcomes the molecular weight shortcoming for improved film performance and allows for coatings less than 350 g/L VOC, but possible disadvantages include compatibility between the solvent, odor and sometimes film lapping.

Alternative Approach – Waterborne Oil-Modified Urethane

As VOC regulations have tightened, resin suppliers are focused on waterborne (WB) approaches. Conventional polyurethane dispersion (PUD) is prepared by several routes, and the polymer formed is a predominantly linear polyurethane-urea.2 The polyurethane-urea dispersion forms a film by lacquer dry, which is by evaporation of co-solvent, water and neutralizer to form a thermal plastic film, as shown in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2 » Polyurethane dispersion lacquer dry.

FIGURE 2 » Polyurethane dispersion lacquer dry. ©PCI

The conventional polyurethane dispersion can be modified by using fatty acid from vegetable oil and results in an oil-modified waterborne urethane.3 Since this waterborne urethane contains unsaturation, it can be formulated into a varnish by adding metallic drier. Similar to conventional high-molecular-weight PUD, after applying this urethane as a coating it initially forms a hard lacquer dry film followed by auto-oxidation to form a crosslinked film, as shown in Figure 3. In general, the viscosity of the dispersion is less dependent on molecular weight than its solventborne counterparts.

FIGURE 3 » Waterborne OMU crosslinked film formation.

FIGURE 3 » Waterborne OMU crosslinked film formation. ©PCI

The waterborne approach overcomes slow dry and soft film issues commonly seen in lower VOC solventborne approaches due to the high molecular weight of the urethane dispersion, and therefore it is a solid technical approach for continuing VOC reduction in the future. Since the film crosslinking is through oxidative cure, the “post-crosslinking” reaction that happens during or after film formation imparts the film with good mar resistance and black heel mark resistance similar to the solventborne OMU. The high-molecular-weight polymer and urethane linkage not only improves hydrolytic stability, but it also improves abrasion resistance, which is important for hard floor finishing applications. Table 4 compares the performance of a first-generation waterborne OMU varnish (WB OMU I) to a 450 g/L VOC conventional solventborne OMU varnish.

VOC, g/L 188 450
Solids, % 30 50
Co-solvent NMP1 LAMS
Dry hard, hr:min2 0:45 2:00
Sward hardness 36 38
Pencil hardness H H
Konig hardness 108 77
Impact resistance, D/R, in-lbs 160/160 160/160
Mar resistance3 Good Good
Abrasion resistance, mg/loss4 47 100
Chemical resistance5 4.30 4.10
Solvent resistance, double rubs
 Methyl ethylketone >200 >200
 Xylene >200 >200
 Ethanol >200 >200
23 mil Bird bar on glass plate
3Fingernail test, check after 24 hrs
4Taber, CS17 wheels, 1000 cycles, 1kg load, mg loss
5ASTM D-1308 spot test, 23 chemicals, 4 hr exposure, average rating 0-5 with 5=no effect
Table 4. Comparison of WB OMU to SB OMU.

Similar to other PUDs, most waterborne OMUs contain NMP as co-solvent. The co-solvent in PUD aids in the synthesis process and in film formation. Today, though many PUDs contain NMP, it is becoming an issue in many applications. Another drawback for waterborne OMU compared to solventborne OMU is lower solids content, which affects film build.

Solvent-Free and Higher Solids Waterborne Oil-Modified Urethane

A second-generation solvent-free waterborne OMU (WB OMU II) was developed, and though it can form a high-gloss film, post adding co-solvent is recommended to achieve maximum film performance. Since the co-solvent is added in the formulation stage, the reactivity of the co-solvent to isocyanate is not an issue. The real benefit of the solvent-free waterborne OMU is that it offers a wide latitude in solvent selection and it is easy to formulate a NMP-free varnish that has the same VOC and film performance as the NMP-containing waterborne OMU, though the additional solvent lowers the solids content of the varnish.

In order to overcome shortcomings in film build with the lower solids content second-generation waterborne OMU, a third-generation higher solids waterborne OMU (WB OMU III) was developed to reduce the number of coats needed to achieve the desired film thickness. In solventborne OMU the film dry time is greatly affected by the film thickness, so a thinner film dries and achieves performance properties much faster than a thicker film. With the higher solids waterborne OMU, film thickness has a negligible effect on dry time due to the molecular weight of the polymer. Though this third-generation higher solids waterborne OMU contains NMP, the next-generation product being developed will retain the high solids content and performance properties of the third generation without the addition of NMP.

Waterborne OMU is a low-VOC biobased polymer option to replace conventional solventborne OMU. Equivalent to the conventional solventborne OMU, the waterborne OMU has good mar resistance, equal abrasion resistance, good chemical resistance and forms a warm looking amber film. Both the solvent-free WB OMU II and higher solids WB OMU III varnishes have been compared to the first-generation WB OMU I varnish; the results are shown in Table 5.

VOC, g/L 188 175 136
Solids, % 30 30 43
Co-solvent NMP DPM1 NMP
Dry hard, hr:min2 0:40 0:35 1:05
Sward hardness 38 36 34
Pencil hardness H H HB
Konig hardness 100 78 85
Impact resistance, D/R, in-lbs 160/160 160/160 160/160
Mar resistance3 Good Good Good
Abrasion resistance, mg/loss4 54 55 66
Chemical resistance5 3.96 3.88 3.75
Solvent resistance, double rubs
 Methyl ethyl ketone >200 >200 >200
 Xylene >200 >200 >200
 Ethanol >200 >200 >200
1Dipropylene glycol methyl ether
23 mil Bird bar on glass plate
3Fingernail test, check after 24 hrs
4Taber, CS17 wheels, 1000 cycles, 1kg load, mg loss
5ASTM D-1308 spot test, 23 chemicals, 4 hr exposure, average rating 0-5 with 5=no effect
Table 5. Comparison of WB OMU I to solvent-free WB OMU II and higher solids WB OMU III

Waterborne OMU Compared to Conventional Polyurethane Dispersion

In general, PUDs are linear polymers or low-crosslink-density precrosslink polymers. These PUDs have been used to formulate 1K or 2K finishes for wood floor coatings for many years. To compare these PUDs with waterborne OMU, a PUD with good hardness and chemical resistance was selected to compare with WB OMU II side by side. This PUD was formulated with a recommended formulation package developed for wood flooring applications. To help with film coalescence, more co-solvent was added into the system to take it to a VOC of 275 g/L. To understand the effect of crosslinking on film performance, polyaziridine was added at 2% to one of the formulated varnishes. As shown in Table 6, it is obvious that post-crosslinking enhances mar resistance.

Conventional W8 OMU II
PUD PUD+Grosslinker
VOC, g/L 275 275 180
Co-solvent Carbitol1 Carbitol DPM2
Crosslinker None AZD3 Oxidative
Wax dispersion 4 Yes Yes No
Abrasion resistance, mg loss5 17 16 34
Dry hard, hr:min 1:05 0:45 0:35
Sward hardness 46 46 34
Konig hardness 136 132 98
Pencil hardness HB F F
Impact resistance, D/R, in-lbs 160/160 160/160 160/160
Mar resistance Fair Good Good
Mar resistance rating, g6 50 150 200
Coefficient of friction7 0.46 0.47 0.69
Chemical resistance8 3.52 3.85 3.93
Solvent resistance, double rubs
 Methyl ethyl ketone >200 >200 >200
 Xylene >200 >200 >200
 Isopropanol >200 >200 >200
Film color Clear Clear Amber
2Dipropylene glycol methyl ether
3Polyaziridine PZ-28, 2%
4BYK Aquacer 539, 0.75%
5Taber, CS-17 whells, 1000cycles, 1kg load, mg loss
6Hoffman Tester, loop styfus, weight needed to mar film
7ASTM D-2047, James Machine
8ASTM D-1308 spot test, 23 chemicals, 4 hr exposure, average rating 0-5 with 5=no effect
Table 6. Comparison of PUD with WB OMU II

Wax dispersion can be added into PUD to help improve mar resistance, but the selection must be done very carefully since it also lowers the coefficient of friction, which makes the coating film slippery. To achieve mar resistance in conventional PUD, the urethane needs to have higher hardness. The harder PUD will also require more co-solvent for film coalescence, which in turn increases the VOC of the PUD. Alternately, waterborne OMU does not need to have a high hardness urethane backbone or additional co-solvent to achieve mar resistance since it has inherent mar resistance from post-crosslinking at a lower VOC. Waterborne OMU is also a stable, one-component biorenewable system that does not require the use of external crosslinker.


For over 50 years, vegetable oil-based oil-modified urethanes and uralkyds have been used in a wide variety of wood coatings for both professional and do-it-yourself (DIY) markets, and these resilient polymers are still preferred today. Conventional solventborne OMUs have a VOC content over 450 g/L, so as VOC regulations tighten, research and development has focused on lowering the VOC of these polymers. The high solids and exempt solvent approaches have dominated solventborne OMU and uralkyd product development, but by combining the two approaches, a varnish that meets current VOC regulations for most states has been recently commercialized. With these regulations continuing to tighten, the waterborne OMU is the best option. Waterborne OMU has all the advantages of solventborne OMU including inherent mar resistance, chemical resistance and amber film color, while overcoming the shortcomings of low-VOC solventborne OMU including slow dry and softer film. Recent research efforts have led to products that are high solids, NMP free and supplied at less than 100 g/L.


1. Waythomas, D.J. GB 14414 (1963).
2. Dieterich. D. Aqueous Emulsions, Dispersions and Solutions of Polyurethane; Synthesis and Properties. Progress In Organic Coatings 1981(9), 281-340.
3. Petschke, G. Waterborne Oil Modified Urethane for Compliant Wood Floor Varnishes. Western Coatings Societies 22nd Biennial Symposium 1995.

Copyright of this article by PCI. We are sharing and promoting the market innovation.
If you like this article, kindly to visit